Carl Wayne Buntion, the man convicted of the 1990 murder of Houston police officer James Irby, was executed in Texas on April 21, 2022, at the age of 78, becoming the oldest inmate executed in the state in the modern era of the death penalty. The event, which marked Texas’ first execution of 2022, capped off a complex legal battle that had spanned over three decades.
The Crime
The fatal shooting of Officer Irby took place nearly 35 years ago during a routine traffic stop. As Irby was engaged with the driver, Buntion, a passenger in the car, stepped out and shot the officer in the forehead, then fired twice more as Irby fell to the ground. The shooting was brutal, and as Buntion fled the scene, he attempted a carjacking, fired at another officer, and even held another person at gunpoint before being arrested.
At the time of the crime, Buntion was 46 years old and had an extensive history of drug-related and violent felonies. In the car’s trunk, authorities found heroin, which further compounded his criminal actions.
Legal Battles
Buntion’s case became a prolonged legal saga. After his conviction in 1991 for capital murder, he was sentenced to death, but his execution was delayed by numerous legal challenges, most notably regarding the fairness of the sentencing process.
In the early 1990s, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Texas’ death penalty procedures were unconstitutional for failing to instruct juries to properly consider mitigating factors—such as mental illness or childhood trauma—before imposing a death sentence. This ruling was pivotal in Buntion’s case. His lawyers fought for years to have this issue reconsidered, arguing that his troubled childhood and his actions on death row—where he was reported to have been well-behaved—should be enough to warrant a life sentence instead of execution.
However, in 2009, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that Buntion deserved a new punishment hearing, though his capital murder conviction was upheld. In the subsequent 2012 trial, the jury once again found Buntion guilty and sentenced him to death, despite testimony from Buntion’s brother about their abusive childhood and a prison official’s statement about Buntion’s lack of violent behavior during his time on death row.
Arguments for Clemency
Leading up to his execution, Buntion’s legal team pushed for clemency, citing his age and the lack of violent behavior during his years on death row. They argued that Buntion, who had developed multiple health issues including liver disease and impaired mobility, was no longer a threat to society. Furthermore, they claimed that his advanced age and the years of solitary confinement he had endured were punishment enough. His lawyers wrote in a court briefing that carrying out the execution would serve no legitimate purpose, asserting that his long-term confinement and peaceful behavior in prison had already sufficiently met the demands of justice.
Despite these arguments, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a final request to pause the execution. Buntion’s legal team contended that his death would serve as an example of a system that was more concerned with punitive measures than with justice or fairness.
More True Crime: The Chilling Case of Gloria Aiken: Love, Betrayal, and Murder
The Execution
On the evening of his execution, Buntion was calm, offering a brief statement before receiving the lethal injection. He expressed remorse for the death of Officer Irby, saying, “I wanted the Irby family to know one thing: I do have remorse for what I did.” He also told his friends that he was “ready to go,” acknowledging the time that had passed since the murder and the impact of his actions on both families involved.
Prison officials began administering the lethal dose of pentobarbital at 6:26 p.m. and pronounced him dead at 6:39 p.m.
The Legacy of the Case
Buntion’s case remains one of the most contentious in Texas’ death penalty history. The complex layers of legal challenges, public opinion on the death penalty, and Buntion’s long wait on death row make this a case that raises important questions about the application of capital punishment in modern times.
His execution brings to light the ongoing debate about whether the death penalty is still a justifiable form of punishment, particularly when considering the age, health, and long-term confinement of prisoners like Buntion. Some argue that the death penalty no longer serves its intended purpose and that life sentences without the possibility of parole are a more humane alternative.
While Buntion’s execution is now part of Texas’ legal history, the case continues to spark conversation around criminal justice, redemption, and the morality of the death penalty.
Lisa Crow contributed to this article. She is a true crime junkie and lifestyle blogger based in Waco, Texas. Lisa is the Head of Content at Gigi’s Ramblings and Southern Bred True Crime Junkie. She spends her free time traveling when she can and making memories with her large family which consists of six children and fifteen grandchildren.
